The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is a law (bill) of the United States proposed in 2011 to fight online trafficking in copyrighted intellectual property and counterfeit goods. Proposals include barring advertising networks and payment facilities from conducting business with allegedly infringing websites, barring search engines from linking to the sites, and requiring Internet service providers (ISP) to block access to the sites. The bill would criminalize the streaming of such content, with a maximum penalty of five years in prison.
User-content websites such as YouTube would be greatly affected, and concern has been expressed that they may be shut down if the bill becomes law. Opponents state the legislation would enable law enforcement to remove an entire internet domain due to something posted on a single blog, arguing that an entireonline community could be punished for the actions of a tiny minority. In a 1998 law, copyright owners are required to request the site to remove the infringing material within a certain amount of time. SOPA would bypass this "safe harbor" provision by placing the responsibility for detecting and policing infringement onto the site itself.
Lobbyists for companies that rely heavily on revenue from intellectual property copyright state it protects the market and corresponding industry, jobs, and revenue. The US president and legislators suggest it may kill innovation. Representatives of the American Library Association state the changes could encourage criminal prosecution of libraries. Other opponents state that requiring search engines to delete a domain name begins a worldwide arms race of unprecedented censorship of the Web and violates the First Amendment.
On January 18, English Wikipedia, Reddit, and several other internet companies coordinated a service blackout to protest SOPA and its sister bill, the Protect IP Act. Other companies, including Google, posted links and images in an effort to raise awareness. An estimated 7,000 smaller websites either blacked out their sites or posted some other kind of protest. A number of other protest actions were organized, including petition drives, boycotts of companies that support the legislation, and a rally held in New York.
Our creative freedom to express, create, appropriate, and share would be severely compromised. Non-revenue seeking websites like this blog could be affected.
To put it into perspective, just about every post made so far on this blog would be subject to law enforcement. Youtube being shut down? I think Facebook would also risk being shut down. So would Ebay, millions of blogs, and millions of personal websites.
Please give me your thoughts.
6 comments:
The government needs to leave our internet the f#*k alone!
Agreed. I have even signed a petition via Google regarding this issue.
can u post a link to this petition on the blog?
I think it's very big brother scary. For the government to be able to delete blogs, youtube videos or wikipedia pages means they are not only finding out everything we mention but controlling what we say. We are constitutionally given the right to be innocent until proven guilty. This would give the government the ability to delete our page without proving we did anything or giving us a chance to fix it and most small businesses wouldn't have the money to fight for their page back.
I think that the PIPA and SOPA cancelled their attempt to pass the bill indefinitely. I'll get the link.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16655272
Post a Comment